Cheshire Police and Crime Commissioner election

It has been around two-and-a-half weeks since I decided to attempt to directly engage with democracy by writing to the five candidates standing in the Cheshire Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) elections:

  • Ainsley Arnold (Liberal Democrat)
  • Louise Bours (UK Independence Party)
  • John Dwyer (Conservative)
  • Sarah Flannery (independent candidate)
  • John Stockton (Labour)

In order to ask them about whether, as Cheshire PCC, they would:

  • Protect vulnerable road users such as pedestrians and cyclists by ensuring that negligent drivers who kill or maim vulnerable road users are properly pursued and investigated by the Police
  • Tackle so-called minor motoring offences, such as speeding, red-light jumping, pavement driving and smartphone use whilst driving which diminish safety (both real and perceived) for vulnerable road users.
  • Deal with the blight of illegal and anti-social parking, which is particularly prevalent in Chester where there is currently close to zero enforcement against motorists who obstruct pavements and park in restricted areas.

Despite the widespread apathy towards these elections, only one of the candidates I wrote to replied at all. To my surprise, the candidate who replied was John Dwyer, the Conservative Party candidate:

“I realise that your focus is on cyclists and pedestrians but I feel there is a wider picture relating to all road users.

The vast majority of motorists are decent hard working law abiding people like you and me. However, there is a small number who, quite frankly, don’t give a thought to others on the road. These are people who don’t tax and insure their cars, who drink and drive, who take drugs and drive and who regularly break speed limits, particularly in residential areas. There is also a minority [sic] who park carelessly causing obstruction in the way you have described in your letter.

Where these issues are presenting themselves I would want the police and other enforcement agencies, such as local authorities, to take steps to prevent the committing of the offences in the first place and to take appropriate enforcement steps where the preventative measures have failed to work. The Crown Prosecution Service has told me that if the Police and Crime Commissioner indicates to them that this is a particular issue in a certain area then they will judge enforcement to be ‘in the public interest’ and not dismiss prosecution as an option.

It is my intention to ensure that we have robust processes in place to provide me with the appropriate information to support the positive action I know you are seeking.”

I have not heard from any other the other candidates, other than Sarah Flannery‘s representative on Twitter, who led me to believe she may have intended to reply but has not done so at the time of writing. I can only surmise that the other candidates saw my letter was to do with pedestrian and cyclist issues and decided that it was not worth their time.

I was also interested to see that Rod King of Twenty’s Plenty had engaged with Louise Bours, the UKIP candidate to see if she was supportive of the campaign. The response given is quite telling. Unprompted, whilst professing some support for 20 mph, she chooses to defend the criminal behaviour of motorists who choose to ignore speed limits on dual carriageways.

Honestly, my attempt to engage with the democratic process, and the corresponding lack of interest from four of the five candidates has left me feeling rather disaffected with the whole thing.  However, I urge you all to go out and vote tomorrow, even if you just spoil your ballot paper.


4 thoughts on “Cheshire Police and Crime Commissioner election

  1. Hi, I apologise for mislaying your original letter but I did email your briefly this morning to say that Improving road safety is a major issue for everyone and it can only be done by continued multi-agency progress that takes account of evidence as well as the concerns of the various groups of road users.
    Road design is attracting a lot of attention, as is greater use of technology. However, as PCC I’d be interested in the steps we can focus on right now: better visibility; 20mph zones introduced around schools as a minimum; less emphasis on speeding per se and more on the dangers of the inappropriate use of speed; a review of cyclist safety measures; shared streets etc.

    I have also indicated my support for the Twenty’s Plenty campaign.

    Best wishes


  2. Sarah,

    Thanks for getting in contact, unfortunately I have not received your email, if you wish to re-send it I will be happy to update the post. I agree that road design is the major issue which needs to be addressed on the UK road network (As in The Netherlands) however this is largely beyond the scope of the PCC role.

    With respect to visibility, are you referring to sight lines on roads or the visibility of road users? Sight lines influence how fast people feel it is appropriate to travel (as does road width) whilst the visibility of road users is a bit more of a problem; vulnerable road users are forever being told to ‘be more visible’ in order to prevent them from becoming the victims of negligent drivers. In addition to the ethical problems which come from expecting victims to defend themselves, no amount of high-visibility gear will can force a driver to actually look. I would also be interested to hear which cyclist safety measures you are referring to.

    Enforcement of 20mph zones (currently sadly lacking whilst limits are routinely flouted) would be welcome.

    Finally, whilst I can understand that focussing on inappropriate use of speed rather than speeding per se sounds like good sense, it is important to be aware that this term been almost entirely co-opted by people who oppose almost all attempts to curb the dangerous excesses of motorists, such as the ABD.

  3. At least you have a choice in Cheshire. Here in Dyfed Powys we only have a Conservative and a Labour candidate. Frankly, the idea of voting far any party sponsored person (neither of whom have any prior experience in The Job) to run the police is anathema. when I was a policeman (many decades ago) we “policed” working to something called The Duties Of A Constable (this applies to all ranks) surprisingly these are ranked in order:-

    The Protection of Life and Limb
    The Protection of Property
    The Prevention of Crime
    The Detection of Crime
    The maintenance of the Queens Peace

    I would suggest the the over riding emphasis on the first point should influence the activities of the Police Commissioner and should encompass the points that you have enquired about – the way our roads are policed should be primarily to protect life and limb not allow !appropriate speeding”.

    • Well put. There are several organisations which govern over various aspects of our daily lives and which claim to value life above all else but whenever their remit overlaps with the public road network, the convenience and freedom of motorists always seems to take priority over the lives of more vulnerable users.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s